YesterNow
Wednesday, February 10, 2021
The Maverick Tamed
Friday, November 14, 2014
Just a few days in Jaffna
DHRITIMAN CHATERJIDhritiman Chaterji visits the island nation and sees how things have changed
Friday, September 16, 2011
The Name Game
Wanting to change the name of a State because it comes low down in the alphabetical order has to be reasoning of the most bizarre, not to say, insensitive kind. You almost expect a Committee to be set up to correlate ‘Quantum of Central Government Grants with Alphabetical Position of States’; final report to be presented in the Winter session of the Assembly, accompanied by full scale walkouts, dislocation of furniture, etc.
I mean, Tamilnadu is just 3 steps up the ladder, and doing quite well, thank you. And not just for alphabetical reasons.
No wonder politicians aren’t exactly the flavour of the season, you tell yourself. But
And then, in the papers, one cloudy morning not so long ago…Paschim Banga. Paschim of what?
Consider this. Non- Bengalis (whom a Bengali friend wickedly terms ‘not-Bengali’) have a tough time with ‘Kolkata’ and it saddens you no end to hear the name of your very own city being distorted in the most peculiar ways. What, oh, what will they do with Paschim/ Pashchim Banga/ Bango/ Bongo (except a lot of byango, that is?) Did the Wise Ones think of this? They had no problems at all pronouncing it, but it is true that they were all Bengalis. But aren’t we a multilingual, multicultural State and don’t we take pride in our inclusiveness? That’s all very well, but it was a unanimous decision taken by 13 people, never mind that they didn’t all think alike and never mind how the dictionary defines ‘unanimous’. And, remember, the decision took just 10 minutes.
So why waste ‘
But haven’t we demonstrated once and for all (with distinguished Bengali writers doing a lot of the demonstrating) that English is by now an ‘Indian’ language? Remember a man called Tagore and the Prize that he got called the Nobel? In more recent times, remember the prose of Amartya Sen and Amitav Ghosh? And in any case, if the yoke had to be shaken (and not stirred), did we have to make such a scrambled egg out of it? Could we not have waited, invited opinions, encouraged discussion, weighed countless aspects of what is surely a crucial decision in the cultural life, in the very identity of a State? Ten minutes is all it takes these days, we are given to understand.
What culture, what identity, you might ask. Here’s the answer, you are told. It is a political decision. Your elected representatives have taken it according to their party diktats. And as we all know, parties are more important than people. Now go and live with it for the rest of your life.
No, wait. If the ‘Quantum of Central Government Grants to Alphabetical Position’ graph doesn’t climb, we might consider another nudge up the alphabetical ladder next year.
Friday, July 11, 2008
The Ocean in His Backyard
Barely a kilometre to the east of the highway, the coastline is dotted with fishing villages. There is electricity but no running water and few toilets. There is alcoholism among the men and a reluctance to go to school among the children.
Balan came to the village of Injambakkam with his family about 3 years ago from his hometown of Kumbakonam. He is a mason, an expert roof layer, but even with the spate of construction going on all around, he cannot get regular work. He finds it difficult to put together the initial capital of $100 or so to, as he says, ‘launch himself’. $100 is rather less than the average family from the city spends on a weekend bash at one of the nearby resorts. Balan is taciturn, dignified and is in a way exceptional for he does not drink and does not indulge in the nightly ritual of wife beating.
Balan’s wife Sulochana looks much older than her 40 odd years. She usually wears an oddly blank expression, as if her mind has caved in under her load of worries. The older son drives a trishaw and considers himself the main provider. This gives him the right to beat his mother, since his father won’t. Somebody has to keep the women in their place. The younger son’s eyes are bright with intelligence but all efforts to send him to school have failed. He is Balan’s apprentice and a television addict. Illiteracy has already defined his future.
The older daughter, together with her mentally retarded child, has been deserted by her husband. She has come back to live with her parents. She is ‘family’ and it would be unthinkable to ask her to fend for herself. In any case, fending for herself could only mean working as domestic help, with probably a little bit of prostitution, brewing illicit liquor or drug dealing on the side. The younger daughter, Nagu, is just into her 20-s and unmarried.
The apple of the family’s eye is Goutam, Nagu’s 6-month old son. Getting Nagu’s pregnancy confirmed was difficult enough – being made to run from pillar to post at Government hospitals, having to borrow money for the tests and so on. The family was aghast and the truth had to be beaten out of Nagu, quite literally. Another daughter had been married to Govindan, who had children by her. Then she died. The family believes that she was killed by Govindan and his family for dowry she could not bring. It did not even occur to them to go to the police, for they knew they did not have the money to buy justice. Govindan had been demanding that Nagu now be given to him to bring up the children. The family had refused but Govindan hung around. And then one day, claims Nagu, he had waylaid her by the community toilet, tied her down and had sex with her.
Abortion was out of the question, especially as far as Sulochana was concerned. A grandchild was coming and had to be welcomed, regardless of marriage or social approval. And so here’s Goutam, a strong, happy infant, ready to break out into a smile at the slightest excuse. Everybody in the family adores him. The neighbours have accepted him as just another kid who will grow up in Injambakkam along with a swarm of others. In time, he will find his place in the almost inevitable cycle of poverty, lack of education, lack of self-esteem, struggling to find work, struggling to raise a family, struggling with alcoholism… struggle, struggle and yet more mind-deadening struggle.
The families that drive down to the beach in their shiny new Korean model cars (Chennai is being billed as the Detroit of India) would not approve of this state of affairs. They would see no courage, no compassion, no dignity in the decision the family took. “This is the way all these poor people behave”, they would say. “And besides, the child is illegitimate.”
Quite right. He is illegitimate not only because his mother is not married but because the resurgent new India has no place for him. As his inquisitive little head jerks from side to side, the blue of the ocean in his backyard shines in his bright little eyes.
Half A Century Ago
No sentiment is more dangerous, they say, than nostalgia. The past is another country, another reality. But the past is also history. And without a sense of history, it is scarcely possible to begin to understand the present…or the future.
I remember the sixties mainly as a period when the Nehruvian vision of society was still alive. It was honourable to be poor or moderately comfortable financially. It was bad to be rich and absolutely unspeakable to flaunt wealth. One depended implicitly on the State for education, health and a host of other services. Inefficiency and corruption were bemoaned but the public sector was seen as something that needed to be improved, not discarded.
And aah!...the arts, the arts. You went to a host of all- night music festivals and discussed the performances, bleary eyed, in the college canteen or nearby coffee house the following day. That, in any case, was where most of the teaching and learning took place, not in the classroom.
You thronged to film festivals. Cinema seemed to have been re-discovered as the new medium after Pather Panchali. (The re- discovery of Bimal Roy and Guru Dutt came much more recently- whereby hangs another interesting tale). There was no question that cinema had a social purpose (though Cesare Zavattini, Italian Communist Party member, Neo- realism ideologue and De Sica’s contemporary, had said long ago that cinema changed nothing).
The first New Wave package of films came from France around 1963, and we were agog. Soon after, Mrinal Sen made Aakaash Kusum, complete with freezes and jump cuts, which we had not seen till then.
There was a sense that something was about to happen, although that is probably being wise after the fact. Look at the late 60-s and early 70-s and see what did happen – Ray’s Kolkata films, Sen’s Bhuvan Shome and Kolkata films, Adoor Gopalakrishnan’s best work, Ritwick Ghatak, Aravindan…quite apart, of course, from the tremendous things that were happening in Europe…
Only Plays or Some Theatre Too?
The Hindu Theatre Fest, Chennai, August 2007
It has been nice to have something to genuinely look forward to for so many evenings in a row. It was nice to know that a few hundred people were heading for a hall with a common purpose. Nothing compared to the thousands who head for cinema halls to see The Boss, but still…
The challenge of open spaces
What theatre workers and theatregoers have been doing over these 11 days is sharing an open space created by the Metro Plus Theatre Fest, a kind of Theatre Commons. The organisers deserve our thanks. We have to remember, though, that a common space has to be looked after, tended and even expanded by all who use it. Space, whether physical, intellectual or artistic, is a scarce resource and one has to be prepared to share it. Otherwise it loses that very special quality of openness. The wonderful thing about being in a space over a period of time is that its contours and its uses become sharper and thoughts and questions arise about how to nurture it and use it better. Here, for what it’s worth, are some of the things I’ve been thinking about.
A particularly enterprising film society in Kolkata started its own international film festival a few years ago. The event took root, grew popular and soon became the official Kolkata International Film Festival. So sharing has its rewards. Who is to say that the Metro Theatre Fest will not become the Chennai International Theatre Festival? And what can the stakeholders do to prepare the ground, as it were?
Without meaning the slightest disrespect to those who take responsibility for it now, does it make sense to appoint a Festival Director to design the event, choose the plays and mount other related activities? It needn’t be the same person every year, needless to say. It’s futile to try to put together a list of the year’s ‘best’ plays. No such list can ever be possible. So why not let the audience share one knowledgeable, sensitive, committed person’s vision instead? Would it help to organise the programme under broad themes- say 12 plays, 3 themes?
A launch party is all very well. Everybody loves a Big Bash. But does it say ‘5 Star Entertainment for the Chennai Elite’ too loudly? Would a daylong seminar with well- prepared papers set a more appropriate tone? Surely there’s a whole host of issues theatre workers should be discussing. And what better occasion than this? Can discussions, exhibitions, film shows be facilitated during the course of the Fest with the help of other organisations such as the Indian Council for Cultural Relations, the Alliance Francaise, the British Council, the Goethe Institut? In other words, can the Fest be about more than just putting on and watching plays? Over time, can it ground itself in the larger context of theatre?
And then, of course, there’s the seemingly intractable question of representation. The Fest is about theatre in English, even though it doesn’t say so explicitly. Is there a special reason for foregrounding this segment? Is it truly representative of theatre in Chennai or in Tamil Nadu? And are English plays from Delhi, Kolkata and Mumbai truly representative of theatre practice in these centres? Would the inclusion of Indian language plays (yes, yes I know that we think of English as an Indian language too!) spread over a larger number of venues broaden enthusiasm and participation? Or would it just compound the logistical problems? Is it possible to learn from the experience of multilingual festivals elsewhere in the country?
Theatre as process
Speaking of the larger context, one question that has puzzled me for a long time is: What constitutes an English theatre group in this city? Is it commitment to a certain ideology, a certain process, a certain way of doing theatre? No offence meant, but I haven’t seen a great deal of evidence of this. Or is a group defined by a particular person- a director, a producer or a writer- with actors flitting about from group to group like honeybees in a field of flowers? It is true that individuals of extraordinary stature have invested groups with unique significance. Utpal Dutt, Habib Tanvir and Badal Sarkar come to mind, as does Arianne Mnouchkine, from very different fields of theatre practice. But, seriously, is English theatre in Chennai ready for this?
Unless theatre workers reflect on the meaning and integrity of groups, shall we be able to move up from merely putting up plays to doing theatre? Do we tend to use the ‘amateur’ status of English theatre as an excuse? Amateur is not the same as amateur-ish and the difference between amateur and professional is often in the mind, in the attitude and understanding, not in the money available.
Do we understand that theatre is anchored in a continuum? Do we ignore the importance of learning- of theories, traditions and texts? Does the energy we devote to theatre as process match the enthusiasm that we have for turning out a product, for staging a play? Above all, can we replace the notion of theatre as entertainment with the notion of theatre as engagement? Entertainment is such a tiresome, one- sided concept. Engagement is so much more exciting. It means that you see the audience as partners in the experience, that you involve, mystify and provoke it.
Enter the Audience
That the audience is willing to be engaged was demonstrated by the Stages Theatre Group’s forum experiment. There is a notion that the English theatre audience is affluent, elite, interested only in a good evening’s entertainment. Changing one’s class character is not easy and you can’t really be expected to carry a copy of your Income Tax returns when you buy a ticket. But the contribution of the audience is vitally necessary to push the boundaries of the Theatre Commons. There seems to be one good place to start: demand more, not in quantity but in quality, relevance, innovation, experiment. Do not be passive or polite in your criticism. Be willing to see theatre in basic, even uncomfortable spaces, so that you can relieve theatre groups of the burden of finding money to hire luxurious, air- conditioned halls. Without the audience as enthusiastic participant, there will be no worthwhile theatre.
Curtains
That’s about it then. There’s neither time nor space to discuss individual plays…but there will always be a next time. Suffice it to say that I value whatever friendships I have in theatre more than any foolhardy notions of frank and fearless theatre criticism.
Whatever else the audience may or may not take away from this Festival, one thing is certain. The vital statistics of a particular brand of car will be scored indelibly in their collective memory. Is there any truth in the rumour that, at the next Festival, we shall have the privilege of actually seeing this car, or its successor, on stage, embedded skillfully in various scripts?
Friday, September 16, 2005
The Water Sutra
Chandralekha phoned to invite me to a talk she was giving that evening, not so many evenings ago.
‘On what?’ I asked.
‘Oh, some gibberish’ she said. And then the laughter, more a self-deprecating, musical giggle, tinkled. It was a melody I’d heard many times, on the phone and sitting face to face, on the floor, at her home and ours, chatting. Chatting about gardens, traditional Indian board games, graphics and posters, common friends, the state of the beach in Chennai…about everything except dance. For I know nothing of dance.
So what am I doing writing about her?
In a week from now, she gets the Kalidas Samman in Bhopal, one of the most venerated peer-awarded honours in this country. In a career spanning 5 decades and more, Chandra has not exactly been inundated with accolades and, as she tells the gathering that evening, the Kalidas Samman means ‘a hell of a lot’ to her. Not perhaps the most demure choice of words, but then, that’s Chandra.
Her work is not really about dance. That’s why I can try writing about her. It is about…well…water. Water. Something that I love. Something that none of us can do without. Something that, sadly, is becoming scarcer and more polluted.
That evening, she talked about her work as being an exploration of the body, and the space in which the body lives. About the rigours of that exploration, the energy that goes into it and, at the same time, radiates from it. She talked about how, after a performance, the body welcomes water – how delicious it is to drink, how refreshing it is to bathe in. On an earlier occasion, some of us had got together to listen to her recite an Elegy to Water, a long dirge that bemoaned the confiscation of water and, with it, the loss of nature and of rights: the right to livelihood, civil, gender and political rights. Most of us in that gathering were performers of one kind or another (there were no politicians, though) and she had wondered whether the Elegy could become a performance. Some day, Chandra, some day, when the time is right.
Water as primal element, as life force, water as metaphor. I know Chandra by a laughter that tinkles gently like the clear waters of the Alakananda gliding over smooth stone; and by a shock of white hair that gushes gracefully forth like the surge of the Bhagirathi. I think of a confluence, of Devaprayag. Could that be the title of her next piece? Sharira, Shloka, Raga. And 6 pieces before that in the last 18 years. All taking place at the confluence where raging body meets serene space. Engaging it, extending into it, shaping it, sculpting it over time. Becoming part of it.
If this is the quest, it goes much beyond the classical tradition of dance as we know it, dance as devotion, as narrative and as virtuosity of performance. It becomes philosophical investigation and political action. By fusing body and space, it reclaims the advaita principle. By contextualising the ever-changing uses and abuses of the body, it proclaims resistance to the status quo.
I think of another wise, white haired woman who is ever so contemporary, yet ever so classical. Accepting the Friedenspreis Peace Prize at the recent Frankfurt Book Fair (on which occasion the US Ambassador was not present, for how could he be seen in the company of a humanist when his Government was engaged in a war against humanity?), Susan Sontag said: “A writer, I think, is someone who pays attention to the world. That means trying to understand, take in, connect with, what wickedness human beings are capable of; and not being corrupted - made cynical, superficial - by this understanding. One task of literature is to formulate questions and construct counter-statements to the reigning pieties. And even when art is not oppositional, the arts gravitate toward contrariness.” Replace writer and literature with performer and performance, and you have Chandra and her work.
I wish I could be present at Bharat Bhavan next Saturday to see who’s present and who’s not and to hear Chandra’s acceptance speech. I wonder what inspired gibberish I’ll be missing.
(Chandralekha is a wondrous dancer based in Chennai, India)